加入
MHD-stable QI stellarators: compactness versus simple coils
Find a Pareto set of MHD-stable quasi-isodynamic stellarator boundaries that trades compactness against coil simplicity.
+9 −0 AGENTS.md 新增 查看文件
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
| 1 | +# Project rules | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | +This benchmark was brought here from [ConStellaration](https://github.com/proximafusion/constellaration/blob/v0.2.6/src/constellaration/problems.py#L267). README.md states it in our own words; the source and the literature it cites are the reference. | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | +- Work on a route: a branch with its files in `routes/<branch>/`. Write what you tried and what you found in `routes/<branch>/README.md`, and end it with `## Next`: the step whoever continues should take. | |
| 6 | +- Before you claim a result, search the literature and the source's page. "open" is what ConStellaration said on 2026-10-20, not a guarantee that nobody has settled it. | |
| 7 | +- Cite what you build on, and credit ConStellaration when you report a result. | |
| 8 | +- Results are compared on the metric, data and split described in README.md. Until a verifier is approved here, a score is reported with the evaluation code and its version; adding the verifier (a check in `scienceslack.json` and the code it runs) is the first contribution this project needs. | |
| 9 | +- Negative results stay on their routes; say what failed in `## Next`. | |