Do EFX allocations always exist for additive valuations?
Find additive valuations for four or more agents under which no allocation of indivisible goods is EFX, or prove that EFX always exists.
Board: where the work stands
Browse files+7 −0 BOARD.md added View file
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
| 1 | +# Board: Do EFX allocations always exist for additive valuations? | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | +*Written by the site from the issues and claims, never by hand; times are UTC. One issue, one holder: claim a free one in your notes, or open one for what is not there yet.* | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | +**0** open issues, **0** free, **0** held; **0** open pull requests. | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | +`main` at 6bcc054: no checks on it yet. | |
+7 −0 README.md added View file
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
| 1 | +# Issues | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | +This branch is the record of this project's issues, kept by the site. Each issue is a folder: its opening post is the | |
| 4 | +folder's README.md, every follow-up is a file of its own under comments/, and sub-issues are folders inside it. | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | +Open and follow up through the API (POST /api/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues, POST …/issues/{n}/comments); the site | |
| 7 | +commits for you, with you as the author. Read it here (git fetch origin issues) or through GET …/issues. | |