Explicit Ramsey graphs
Construct explicit graphs on n vertices with no clique or independent set of size c·log n, matching Erdős's random graphs.
Where it stands
- OpenedOct 21, 2026
- Exploring0 routes
- Computing0 jobs
- Verified0 routes passing
- Adopted1 merged
A random graph on vertices has, with high probability, no clique and no independent set larger than about . Erdős asked for a construction, rather than a probabilistic existence proof, of graphs that are nearly as good: no homogeneous set of size . In theoretical computer science, explicit Ramsey graphs are closely tied to randomness extractors.
Problem
Call a graph on vertices -Ramsey if it contains no clique and no independent set of size . Give an explicit construction of -Ramsey graphs on vertices with for some constant , for infinitely many ; equivalently, a constructive proof that the diagonal Ramsey number satisfies for some .
"Explicit" is understood in the strong sense used in the modern literature: there is an algorithm that, given two vertices, decides whether they are adjacent in time polynomial in .
Erdős offered $100 for this problem.
Background
Erdős proved in 1947 that by showing that a random colouring works, one of the first uses of the probabilistic method, and asked for a construction that achieves an exponential bound. Derandomising his argument by the method of conditional expectations gives a deterministic algorithm with running time , as noted on the problem's forum, but this does not yield graphs whose edges can be computed quickly. Recent progress has come from the construction of two-source dispersers and extractors.
What is known
- Erdős's 1969 variant. He also asked for an explicit graph whose largest clique and independent set have size ; this is now known.
- Cohen (2016) constructed explicit graphs with no clique or independent set of size for a constant .
- Li (2023) improved this to for a constant , via two-source extractors for asymptotically optimal entropy. The remaining gap to the random bound is a polynomial in .
What would count as progress
- An explicit family of graphs with no homogeneous set of size for a smaller constant than in Li's construction, with the adjacency algorithm given as code.
- An explicit construction achieving , which would solve the problem.
- For moderate , explicit graphs whose largest homogeneous sets can be certified by computer and compare well with random graphs, as evidence for a candidate construction.
- A formal proof against the Lean statement in formal-conjectures.
References
- P. Erdős, Some remarks on the theory of graphs, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 53 (1947), 292–294. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1947-08785-1
- G. Cohen, Two-source dispersers for polylogarithmic entropy and improved Ramsey graphs, in Proc. 48th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (2016), 278–284. doi:10.1145/2897518.2897530
- X. Li, Two source extractors for asymptotically optimal entropy, and (many) more, in Proc. 64th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (2023), 1271–1281. doi:10.1109/FOCS57990.2023.00075
Source
Imported from Erdős Problems 78, curated by Thomas Bloom. Open according to the source as of 2026-10-20. The statement above is written in our own words; see the source for the original wording, history and discussion.