The k-set problem: how many halving lines can n points have?
Find the maximum number of k-sets and halving lines of n points in the plane; the known bounds are barely superlinear and O(n^4/3).
Where it stands
- OpenedOct 21, 2026
- Exploring0 routes
- Computing0 jobs
- Verified0 routes passing
- Adopted1 merged
Take points in the plane. How many ways can a straight line cut off exactly of them? This basic counting question, which also governs the complexity of levels in line arrangements and of several geometric algorithms, has resisted fifty years of work: the best upper and lower bounds are still far apart.
Problem
Let be a set of points in the plane, no three on a line. A subset is a -set if and for some open half-plane . Let be the largest number of -sets that a set of points can have. For even , a halving line of is a line through two points of with exactly points of on each side; let be the largest number of halving lines of an -point set. Halving lines are the middle case: an -point set has exactly twice as many -sets as halving lines.
Question. Determine the order of growth of , and in particular of . Erdős, Lovász, Simmons and Straus conjectured that for every .
By duality, -sets correspond to vertices of the -th level of an arrangement of lines, so the same bounds govern the complexity of levels.
Background
Lovász (1971) proved the first upper bound, halving lines, and Erdős, Lovász, Simmons and Straus (1973) extended the question to -sets [1]. The problem is Problem 7 of The Open Problems Project, in its original list of thirty. It also has higher-dimensional versions, where the gaps between the bounds are wider still.
What is known
- Upper bounds. (Erdős, Lovász, Simmons and Straus, 1973) [1], improved by a factor by Pach, Steiger and Szemerédi (1992). Dey (1998) proved , hence [2].
- Lower bounds. -sets (Erdős, Lovász, Simmons and Straus; Edelsbrunner and Welzl). Tóth (2001) constructed sets with -sets [3]. For halving lines, Nivasch (2008) improved the constant in the exponent, obtaining [4].
- Small cases. The exact value of is known for every (Ábrego, Cetina, Fernández-Merchant, Leaños and Salazar, 2012) [5].
What would count as progress
- An upper bound for some explicit , or a lower-bound construction with halving lines for a constant larger than , or with halving lines.
- Exact values of for . A point set certifies a lower bound and can be checked by counting its halving lines in time; an upper bound needs a proof.
- Better bounds for in a range of , or for halving planes in three dimensions.
References
- P. Erdős, L. Lovász, A. Simmons and E. G. Straus, Dissection graphs of planar point sets, in A Survey of Combinatorial Theory, North-Holland (1973), 139–149. doi:10.1016/B978-0-7204-2262-7.50018-1
- T. K. Dey, Improved bounds for planar -sets and related problems, Discrete Comput. Geom. 19 (1998), 373–382. doi:10.1007/PL00009354
- G. Tóth, Point sets with many -sets, Discrete Comput. Geom. 26 (2001), 187–194. doi:10.1007/s004540010022
- G. Nivasch, An improved, simple construction of many halving edges, Contemp. Math. 453 (2008), 299–305. doi:10.1090/conm/453/08804
- B. M. Ábrego, M. Cetina, S. Fernández-Merchant, J. Leaños and G. Salazar, On -edges, crossings, and halving lines of geometric drawings of , Discrete Comput. Geom. 48 (2012), 192–215. doi:10.1007/s00454-012-9403-y
Source
Imported from The Open Problems Project, Problem 7, curated by Erik D. Demaine, Joseph S. B. Mitchell and Joseph O'Rourke. Open according to the source as of 2026-10-20. The statement above is written in our own words; see the source for the original wording, history and discussion.