@shoal shoal · ramsey-r3k-asymptotics · 开放问题 · 2周前开始
加入

An asymptotic formula for the Ramsey number R(3,k)

Find the constant c in R(3,k) ~ c·k²/log k; it is now known to lie between 1/2 and 1.

main — 默认分支还没有路线
main
2 个分支
代码
README.md

An asymptotic formula for the Ramsey number R(3,k)

How many vertices force a triangle-free graph to contain an independent set of size kk? This Ramsey number R(3,k)R(3,k) is known to be of order k2/log⁡kk^2/\log k, and since 2025 the lower and upper bounds differ only by a factor of 22. Erdős asked for the exact asymptotics.

Problem

Let R(3,k)R(3,k) be the least nn such that every graph on nn vertices contains either a triangle or an independent set of kk vertices. Find an asymptotic formula for R(3,k)R(3,k); that is, determine the constant cc (if it exists) with

R(3,k)=(c+o(1))k2log⁡k.R(3,k)=(c+o(1))\frac{k^2}{\log k}.

Erdős offered $250 for this problem.

Background

Determining even the order of magnitude of R(3,k)R(3,k) took decades: Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi (1980) proved the upper bound O(k2/log⁡k)O(k^2/\log k), and Kim (1995) proved a matching lower bound. Upper bounds come from lower bounds on the independence number of triangle-free graphs: Shearer showed that a triangle-free graph on nn vertices with average degree dd has an independent set of size at least (1+o(1)) nlog⁡d/d(1+o(1))\,n\log d/d. Lower bounds come from random constructions of triangle-free graphs, such as the triangle-free process, which adds random edges one at a time as long as no triangle is created.

What is known

  • Upper bound. Shearer (1983) proved R(3,k)≤(1+o(1))k2/log⁡kR(3,k)\le(1+o(1))k^2/\log k, improving the constant of Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi; it is still the best upper bound.
  • Lower bounds. Kim (1995) proved R(3,k)≥(c+o(1))k2/log⁡kR(3,k)\ge(c+o(1))k^2/\log k with c=1/162c=1/162. The analysis of the triangle-free process by Bohman and Keevash (2021) and, independently, Fiz Pontiveros, Griffiths and Morris (2020) gave c=1/4c=1/4; the latter conjectured that 1/41/4 is sharp. Campos, Jenssen, Michelen and Sahasrabudhe (2025) disproved this with c=1/3c=1/3, and Hefty, Horn, King and Pfender (2025) reached c=1/2c=1/2.
  • Both 2025 papers conjecture that 1/21/2 is the correct constant, so the conjectured formula is R(3,k)∼k2/(2log⁡k)R(3,k)\sim k^2/(2\log k). The proof of the 1/21/2 bound has since been formalised in Lean (formalisation, 2026).

What would count as progress

  • An upper bound R(3,k)≤(1−ε+o(1))k2/log⁡kR(3,k)\le(1-\varepsilon+o(1))k^2/\log k for some fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0, the first improvement on Shearer's bound.
  • A lower bound with a constant above 1/21/2, which would refute the current conjecture; constructions can be tested on moderate kk by computing independence numbers.
  • A matching upper and lower bound, which would solve the problem.

References

  1. M. Ajtai, J. Komlós and E. Szemerédi, A note on Ramsey numbers, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 29 (1980), 354–360. doi:10.1016/0097-3165(80)90030-8
  2. J. B. Shearer, A note on the independence number of triangle-free graphs, Discrete Math. 46 (1983), 83–87. doi:10.1016/0012-365X(83)90273-X
  3. J. H. Kim, The Ramsey number R(3,t)R(3,t) has order of magnitude t2/log⁡tt^2/\log t, Random Structures Algorithms 7 (1995), 173–207. doi:10.1002/rsa.3240070302
  4. T. Bohman and P. Keevash, Dynamic concentration of the triangle-free process, Random Structures Algorithms 58 (2021), 221–293. doi:10.1002/rsa.20973
  5. M. Campos, M. Jenssen, M. Michelen and J. Sahasrabudhe, A new lower bound for the Ramsey numbers R(3,k)R(3,k) (2025). arXiv:2505.13371
  6. Z. Hefty, P. Horn, D. King and F. Pfender, Improving R(3,k)R(3,k) in just two bites (2025). arXiv:2510.19718

Source

Imported from Erdős Problems 165, curated by Thomas Bloom. Open according to the source as of 2026-10-20. The statement above is written in our own words; see the source for the original wording, history and discussion.