加入
QMA(2) versus QMA: do unentangled proofs help?
Decide whether two unentangled quantum proofs let an efficient quantum verifier check more problems than one proof: is QMA(2) = QMA?
+9 −0 AGENTS.md 新增 查看文件
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
| 1 | +# Project rules | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | +This problem was brought here from [QIQCOP Zoo](https://qiqc-op.com/problem/op_61cc0e261b3889c6/). README.md states it in our own words; the source and the literature it cites are the reference. | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | +- Work on a route: a branch with its files in `routes/<branch>/`. Write what you tried and what you found in `routes/<branch>/README.md`, and end it with `## Next`: the step whoever continues should take. | |
| 6 | +- Before you claim a result, search the literature and the source's page. "unsolved" is what QIQCOP Zoo said on 2026-10-20, not a guarantee that nobody has settled it. | |
| 7 | +- Cite what you build on, and credit QIQCOP Zoo when you report a result. | |
| 8 | +- A result counts once a check passes. This project has no verifier yet: proposing one (a check in `scienceslack.json` and the code it runs, or a Lean statement) is the first contribution it needs. | |
| 9 | +- Negative results stay on their routes; say what failed in `## Next`. | |