Lehmer's Mahler measure problem
Beat Lehmer's 1.17628 with an integer polynomial of smaller Mahler measure above 1, or prove the measures stay away from 1.
| 1 | # Lehmer's Mahler measure problem |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Can an integer polynomial have Mahler measure larger than 1 but arbitrarily close to it? Lehmer asked in 1933, and his own degree-10 example, with measure 1.17628..., is still the smallest known; an integer polynomial below it would be checked in seconds. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## Problem |
| 6 | |
| 7 | For a polynomial $f(x) = a_n \prod_{i=1}^{n} (x - \alpha_i)$ with complex coefficients, the *Mahler measure* is |
| 8 | |
| 9 | $$M(f) = |a_n| \prod_{i=1}^{n} \max\{1, |\alpha_i|\}.$$ |
| 10 | |
| 11 | For $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ one has $M(f) \ge 1$, and by Kronecker's theorem $M(f) = 1$ exactly when $f$ is, up to sign, a product of cyclotomic polynomials and powers of $x$. Let |
| 12 | |
| 13 | $$L = \inf \{ M(f) : f \in \mathbb{Z}[x],\ M(f) > 1 \}.$$ |
| 14 | |
| 15 | **Lehmer's question** asks whether $L = 1$. Lehmer's polynomial |
| 16 | |
| 17 | $$\ell(x) = x^{10} + x^9 - x^7 - x^6 - x^5 - x^4 - x^3 + x + 1$$ |
| 18 | |
| 19 | has $M(\ell) = 1.176280\ldots$, so $1 \le L \le 1.176280\ldots$. Determine $L$: prove $L > 1$, or find integer polynomials with measure closer to 1. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | ## Background |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Lehmer met the question in 1933 while studying the factorization of certain cyclotomic functions. Smyth (1971) answered it for non-reciprocal polynomials: if $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ is not reciprocal and $f(0) \ne 0$, then $M(f) \ge M(x^3 - x - 1) = 1.324717\ldots$, so polynomials with measure close to 1 must be reciprocal. For an algebraic number of degree $d$ that is not a root of unity, Dobrowolski proved that its Mahler measure is at least $1 + (1-\epsilon)(\log\log d / \log d)^3$ for large $d$, a bound which tends to 1 and so leaves the question open. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | ## What is known |
| 26 | |
| 27 | - **Upper bound:** $L \le M(\ell) = 1.176280\ldots$ (Lehmer, 1933). Borwein, Dobrowolski and Mossinghoff (2007) note that this is still the smallest known measure larger than 1 of an integer polynomial. |
| 28 | - **Lower bound:** only the trivial $L \ge 1$ is known in general. |
| 29 | - **Partial results:** Smyth's bound for non-reciprocal polynomials (1971), Dobrowolski's degree-dependent bound, and results for restricted classes such as polynomials with odd coefficients (Borwein, Dobrowolski and Mossinghoff, 2007). |
| 30 | |
| 31 | ## What would count as progress |
| 32 | |
| 33 | - An integer polynomial $f$ with $1 < M(f) < 1.176280$. Checking it takes seconds: compute its roots with certified error bounds (for example in ball arithmetic) and confirm it has no cyclotomic factor. |
| 34 | - A proof that $L > 1$ (Lehmer's conjecture), or an explicit lower bound for a natural infinite class of reciprocal polynomials not covered before. |
| 35 | - Whether Lehmer's polynomial attains the minimum is also open. Both statements are in Lean in [formal-conjectures](https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/LehmerMahlerMeasureProblem.lean). |
| 36 | |
| 37 | ## References |
| 38 | |
| 39 | 1. D. H. Lehmer, "Factorization of certain cyclotomic functions", *Annals of Mathematics* 34 (1933), 461–479. [doi:10.2307/1968172](https://doi.org/10.2307/1968172) |
| 40 | 2. C. J. Smyth, "On the product of the conjugates outside the unit circle of an algebraic integer", *Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society* 3 (1971), 169–175. [doi:10.1112/blms/3.2.169](https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/3.2.169) |
| 41 | 3. P. Borwein, E. Dobrowolski and M. J. Mossinghoff, "Lehmer's problem for polynomials with odd coefficients", *Annals of Mathematics* 166 (2007), 347–366. [doi:10.4007/annals.2007.166.347](https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2007.166.347) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | ## Source |
| 44 | |
| 45 | Imported from [Optimization Constants in Mathematics, constant 40a](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/40a.html), curated by Terence Tao and contributors. Open according to the source as of 2026-10-20. The statement above is written in our own words; see the source for the original wording, history and discussion. |