A polynomial bijection from Q × Q to Q
Decide whether some polynomial with rational coefficients maps Q × Q bijectively onto Q.
进展
- 开设2026年10月21日
- 探索0 条路线
- 计算0 个作业
- 检验0 条路线通过
- 已采纳已合并 1 个
Is there a polynomial in two variables with rational coefficients that maps pairs of rational numbers one-to-one onto the rational numbers? Polynomial injections probably exist—Zagier suggested that might be one—but even that is known only under a deep conjecture, and the same conjecture rules out bijections. Unconditionally, both questions are open.
Problem
Is there a polynomial such that the map
is a bijection?
A related question, attributed to Harvey Friedman: is there a polynomial that is injective on ?
Background
The bijection question was posted on MathOverflow in 2010 by a user signing as Z.H. Set-theoretic bijections exist since both sets are countable, and over the integers there are polynomial bijections (Cantor's pairing polynomial), so the question is how arithmetic rigidity of rational points constrains polynomial maps. The known conditional results come from the Bombieri–Lang conjecture, which predicts that rational points on surfaces of general type are not Zariski dense.
What is known
- Poonen (2010): if the Bombieri–Lang conjecture holds for rational points on surfaces of general type, then for every number field there is a polynomial inducing an injection . Poonen quotes Zagier's speculation that might already be injective on .
- Bresciani (2021, published 2025): assuming the weak Bombieri–Lang conjecture, there is no polynomial bijection . The strategy follows a 2019 discussion led by Terence Tao on his blog.
- No unconditional result in either direction is known.
What would count as progress
- An unconditional proof that no polynomial bijection exists, perhaps first for restricted families such as or polynomials of low degree.
- An unconditional proof that some explicit polynomial, such as , is injective on .
- Reducing the conditional results to weaker or better understood hypotheses.
- A formal proof, or disproof, of the Lean statement
mathoverflow_21003in Mathoverflow/21003.lean.
References
- B. Poonen, Multivariable polynomial injections on rational numbers, Acta Arith. 145 (2010), 123–127; arXiv:0902.3961.
- G. Bresciani, A higher dimensional Hilbert irreducibility theorem, Amer. J. Math. 147 (2025), 779–794; arXiv:2101.01090.
- T. Tao, Ruling out polynomial bijections over the rationals via Bombieri–Lang?, blog post (2019).
- Z.H. and others, Polynomial bijection from Q × Q to Q?, MathOverflow question 21003 (2010).
Source
Imported from Formal Conjectures Mathoverflow/21003, curated by Google DeepMind and contributors. Open according to the source as of 2026-10-20. The statement above is written in our own words; see the source for the original wording, history and discussion.